Index Option Calls
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Email Whitelisting
  • Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Email Whitelisting
  • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
Index Option Calls
No Result
View All Result
Home Latest News

Supreme Court conservatives look ready to gut Roe v. Wade during arguments in abortion case

by
December 1, 2021
in Latest News
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

RELATED POSTS

Tesla delivered 254,695 electric vehicles in the second quarter of 2022

‘How quickly the tables have turned’: Falling mortgage rates have homebuyers so emboldened they’re asking sellers for cash

Pro-abortion rights activists protest outside the Supreme Court building, ahead of arguments in the Mississippi abortion rights case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, in Washington, U.S., December 1, 2021.

Jonathan Ernst | Reuters

The Supreme Court’s conservative majority on Wednesday appeared poised to side with Mississippi in its bid to uphold a 15-week abortion ban, a ruling that would erode decades-old precedent protecting the right to an abortion before viability.

The justices heard oral arguments in the case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, that directly challenged the abortion rights precedent established by the 1973 Supreme Court ruling Roe v. Wade and reaffirmed by the Planned Parenthood v. Casey decision in 1992.

The case centers on a Mississippi law that would ban almost all abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy. Lower courts blocked the law, ruling that it violates Roe and Casey, which protect abortion before the point of fetal viability — around 24 weeks of gestation — and require that laws regulating abortion not pose an “undue burden.”

The Mississippi case marks the most significant challenge to abortion rights in decades.

Anti-abortion rights activists protest outside the Supreme Court building, ahead of arguments in the Mississippi abortion rights case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, in Washington, U.S., December 1, 2021.

Jonathan Ernst | Reuters

The 6-3 conservative majority questioned Julie Rikelman, an attorney with the Center for Reproductive Rights arguing in favor of Roe and Casey, about the viability threshold.

“Viability, it seems to me, doesn’t have anything to do with choice,” Chief Justice John Roberts said. “If it really is an issue about choice, why is 15 weeks not enough time?”

Justice Brett Kavanaugh, one of former President Donald Trump‘s three appointees to the court, expressed skepticism that the interests of pregnant women and fetuses can both be accommodated.

“The problem, I think the other side would say, and the reason this issue is hard, is that you can’t accommodate both interests. You have to pick. That’s the fundamental problem,” Kavanaugh told U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, who also argued against Mississippi.

“And one interest has to prevail over the other at any given point in time, and that’s why this is so challenging, I think. And the question then becomes, what does the Constitution say about that?” Kavanaugh said.

The three liberal justices on the nine-member bench, meanwhile, sounded alarms that reversing Roe and Casey would destroy the public perception of the high court, and thus the institution itself.

“Will this institution survive the stench that this creates in the public perception that the Constitution and its reading are just political acts?” asked Sonia Sotomayor, one of the three liberal justices, at the start of oral arguments in a case challenging Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey.

“I don’t see how it is possible,” Sotomayor said.

Roe, Casey and other “watershed decisions” — such as Brown v. Board of Education, which ruled segregation unconstitutional — have created an “entrenched set of expectations in our society,” Sotomayor said.

Reproductive rights activists hold cut out photos of Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett as oral arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health Organization case are held on Wednesday, December 1, 2021.

Bill Clark | CQ-Roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images

“If people actually believe it’s all political, how will we survive? How will the court survive?” she asked.

Mississippi Solicitor General Scott Stewart responded that to avoid the appearance of a politicized court, the justices should reach a decision squarely grounded in the text of the Constitution.

Stewart argued Roe and Casey “haunt our country,” and that the right to an abortion is not supported in the Constitution but in “abstract concepts” that the high court “has rejected in other contexts.”

The liberal justices Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Stephen Breyer grilled Stewart about the justification for reversing or undermining precedent that the court has followed for three decades.

To overturn a long-standing precedent, “usually there has to be a justification, a strong justification,” Kagan said, adding that views on the Roe and Casey decisions have not significantly changed since they were made.

Breyer said the issue in a “super case” like this is that the American people will come to consider justices as “just politicians.”

“That’s what kills us,” Breyer said.

The fight over abortion rights, a perennially controversial and politically polarizing topic, drew an immense crowd protesting both sides of the case outside the Supreme Court building Wednesday morning.

The U.S. Capitol Police said they arrested nearly three dozen people who were blocking street traffic in the area, separate from the lawful demonstrators in front of the building on Capitol Hill.

ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

Tesla delivered 254,695 electric vehicles in the second quarter of 2022

by
July 2, 2022
0

In this article TSLA A giant cowboy boot is on display outside the Tesla Giga Texas manufacturing facility during the...

‘How quickly the tables have turned’: Falling mortgage rates have homebuyers so emboldened they’re asking sellers for cash

by
July 2, 2022
0

Associated Press Russia's messages with missiles tell West to back off The latest in a litany of horrors in Ukraine...

These Americans all left the U.S. for Mexico: How they found their ‘perfect location’ and made it happen

by
July 2, 2022
0

In 2006, after years of living paycheck to paycheck in California, I decided to move to Mexico. I was 50,...

Outdoor cooking boomed during the pandemic, and the grilling industry thinks it will stay hot

by
July 2, 2022
0

In this article WEBR COOK People have been eating and cooking more meals outdoors since the pandemic began, a trend...

If You’ve Got Time, These Three Dividend Aristocrats Should Pay Off

by
July 2, 2022
0

If you're an investor with long time horizon, then you should meet these three high-growth Dividend Aristocrats. Dividend Aristocrats, as...

Next Post

Facebook ends ban on cryptocurrency ads

GM Drops EV Supply-Chain Bomb With Partnership for Battery Components

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

email

Get the daily email about stock.

Please Enter Your Email Address:

By opting in you agree to our Privacy Policy. You also agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

MOST VIEWED

  • A Couple Stored IRA Gold at Home. They Owe the IRS More Than $300,000.

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • A California Couple Spent Eight Years Building Their Dream Retirement Home in Costa Rica

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Goldman Sachs says buy these stocks to play Web 3.0 and the metaverse

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Goldman Sachs picks new stocks to buy — and says these 5 have over 100% upside

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • In his final warning, this stock trading wizard — who made big money in bear markets and crashes — called this market a bubble like no other

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Email Whitelisting
  • Privacy Policy
All rights reserved by www.indexoptioncalls.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Email Whitelisting
  • Privacy Policy

All rights reserved by www.indexoptioncalls.com